I believe competition is a good thing. I feel like, in the past, I have had most success in teaching life lessons with swimmers that compete and correlate their training with their competitions. It was one of those things that I was told as a young coach by my father. "Swimming is Objective, it is a time on the watch. When you make the connection between working hard and improvement when they are young they look forward to training. It is something that they can actually see, as the time on the watch gets faster."
A few weekends ago I watched the documentary, "Happy." It is a look into the study of happiness. Films are bias, so I always take these things and analyze with my own thoughts. One thing that I took from the film though was a Ph. D from Baylor who talked about the release of Dopamine. I remember this from my psychology class a little bit. The more happy someone is, the more dopamine is released in the brain. With time, the release of dopamine slows down, and can lead to diseases like Parkinson's. So they were encouraging doing activities to help keep dopamine releasing quicker. The doctor mentioned that aerobic exercise helped the release of dopamine, but so does competition. He concluded by saying that the best way to keep dopamine being released quickly is obviously physical sports as they have aerobic exercise and competition.
Competition though has led to many with low self-esteem and unhappiness. If competition in itself does help release dopamine, and thus make people more happy. What is the cause of the inverse result? My belief, is that it is the emphasis of winning and losing by the culture. An over emphasis over comparison at the young ages. Competition in itself has a stress of winning and losing, but we have magnified it by our attention to awards, recognition, and comparison to others.
Is there fun in competition? I believe so. Winning and Losing is a single result, not the competing itself. How many times have you played a board game and lost? Or played a card game and lost? Does this weigh on you and taken critically by your friends and parents? Normally not, so you just play again and enjoy yourself. No awards, no ranking, no comparison; just a fleeting sense of loss or victory.
What can emphasis on the result lead to? A slippery slope sometimes. I was also very much into poker when I was young, and I learned about poker. It helped, that right as I was interested poker it had become more main stream, and there was a lot of knowledge being put out on television shows. There is a phrase in poker referred to as being "On Tilt." This is when a poker player takes a loss so personally that they start doing dumb plays that they normally would not have done, and it becomes a slippery slope that can last for days, weeks, months, or years. That one bad hand stays on the mind, and then the next bad play is caused by the previous bad play, and then the next bad play is caused by the two last bad plays are still on the mind. This becomes the overwhelming increase of negativity that burdens you. This isn't just a poker symptom, but a symptom that can overtake anyone who competes.
Competition is a good thing neurologically as it helps the release of dopamine. This release of dopamine can lead to happiness, that I stress to my athletes and many times on this blog. Don't shelter your young swimmers from competition, but see it as an opportunity to compete and increase their happiness in a physical activity. Protect them from our culture that wants to put these heavy burdens on young athletes, and allow them to grow and enjoy themselves. As they grow older they will make higher goals that will be used to push them higher, and the competitions as just another opportunity to try to achieve those goals.
OK now I am really into your blog. Being a poker player myself I totally love that you were able to bring something about poker into swimming.
ReplyDeleteI believe for children sports swimming is one of the few that is totally black and white. There is not one subjective aspect of the sport. It is swimmer and the clock and that is it. It isn't like other sports like say baseball where you can tell yourself and your kid well you aren't playing because the coach doesn't like you or some sort of bs like that. The clock tells the entire story. You are either faster or slower than Johnny. You can't argue it.
It is also brutal that when a swimmer has a bad day you can't hide behind teammates. Everyone easily knows your time. With things like DeckPass and such kids know for sure where they rank.
I think swimmers learn life lessons much earlier in life than other athletes.
The other tough part is how much the dropoff in time improvement there is, especially for girls. Let's face it from 7 to 12 a girl swimmer will enjoy time drops often. In that age three things happen. First they learn how to swim fast. Second they grow. Third they get stronger/faster from all those practice laps. All three of those lead to time drops. Then a girl swimmer hits 13 or 14 and stops growing. By then usually they have their technique mostly down. So really the only way to get faster is grow muscles and that isn't the easiest thing to do. That takes a ton of work. Almost any semi serious girl swimmer can break 30.00 in he 50 free scy. Going from 30 to 25 takes some height, really good technique and maxing out their body. Meaning carrying no extra weight just muscles.
Anyway this post was about competition. It is great for kids to do competition. It can get them more into a sport or it can send them running away from a sport if they fail. It really is just a way to weed out who really wants to swim. The kids that want to swim win and the kids that get to or have to swim don't win in the long run.
Yes there is a sort of weeding out in competition in the long run. My concentration is of the swimmers that are 14 and under. This is a time where they can be weeded out by comparison, but really if you avoid comparison (yes I know it is hard to do with all the technology) then there is a lot to gain from competitions.
DeleteThe emphasis being on best creating happiness through what I can help provide in the form of swimming. That is an aerobic activity that involves competition, which helps promote the quicker release of dopamine which is a scientific way to produce happy feelings and also improve health of the brain.
I have seen many that join swimming for merely fitness and they shelter their child from competition because they think it will lower their self-esteem by losing. Where I have seen the opposite in many of my former young swimmers, even from losing the race, by just the way that a coach and parent deal with the experience. In the long run have some of these swimmers become really good swimmers? not necessarily, but I have seen it also spread to their other activities such as school.
I'm glad you enjoyed the tangent about poker. I try to include some experiences away from the pool at times, as it provides a different perspective to something very similar.